An Employee Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety in Outpatient Surgery
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper provides information on the reliability and validity of an employee questionnaire developed in a study of patient safety in outpatient surgery. The Systems Engineering Intervention in Outpatient Surgery (SEIPS), a collaborative community perspective project currently underway at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, examines the impact of a systems engineering intervention on both employees and patients. In this paper, we describe the SEIPS employee questionnaire, which surveys various elements of the work system (e.g., communication, workplace, supplies, and patient safety climate), the care process, and employee outcomes (e.g., job satisfaction, stress, perceived quality and safety of care provided). Data from a sample of 289 staff members in 5 outpatient surgery centers (53 percent response rate) are used to examine reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, and predictive validity. The results provided evidence for the reliability and validity of the SEIPS study’s employee questionnaire. Introduction The Systems Engineering Intervention in Outpatient Surgery (SEIPS), a collaborative community perspective project currently underway at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, is applying the SEIPS work system model to patient safety in outpatient surgery centers. The objective of the project is to examine the impact of a system intervention on the work system, employee and organizational outcomes, and quality and safety of patient care. The five major outpatient surgery centers in Madison are cooperatively participating in the study. All five sites are members of the Madison Patient Safety Collaborative, a group of local providers committed to improving patient safety in the community who have agreed to not use patient safety to their competitive advantage. In the course of this research study, all employees working in the five outpatient surgery centers were asked to voluntarily respond to an employee survey, designed to assess patient safety in outpatient surgery from the viewpoint of the employees. In this paper, we describe the steps used to develop the content, reliability, and validity of the survey. There is a conceptual framework underlying the structure of the employee questionnaire. In the SEIPS model of work system and patient safety, we Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 2005 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE An Employee Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety in Outpatient Surgery 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
منابع مشابه
Assessing employee safety performance and its Related demographic factors among the workers of a gas refinery
Introduction: Despite the advances in occupational safety, many accidents occur in the workplace. The most of these accidents caused by poor workers safety performance. Knowing the factors that affect safety performance is a suitable guide to planning for occupational accident prevention. This study was conducted to assess workers safety performance and determine its associated demographic fact...
متن کاملPatient safety in outpatient surgery: the viewpoint of the healthcare providers.
The objective of this study is to understand the viewpoint of healthcare providers with regard to patient safety in outpatient surgery settings. Two methods were used to gather data from the healthcare providers: (1) questionnaire with open-ended questions about six predefined stages of the patient care process; (2) survey with closed questions. With the first method, the main quality and safet...
متن کاملAssessment of Noise Effect on Employee Comfort in an Open-Plan Office: Validation of an Assessment Questionnaire
Background: Today, open-plan offices are among the most common work environments. Although the noise in these environments is usually below the standard level, it is one of the critical annoyance factors due to the nature of the mental work. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess noise effects on employee comfort and validate the Persian version of the assessment of noise effects on employee c...
متن کاملDirect and Indirect Employee Questionnaires for Assessing Patient Safety in Saudi Hospitals
Aim: This paper provides information on the reliability and validity of direct and indirect employee questionnaires developed in a study of patient safety that examines the impact of human engineering intervention on both direct and indirect employees. Method: This paper describes the employee questionnaires, which survey various elements of the work system (e.g., heavy workload, inexperience/l...
متن کاملUsing Linear Regression to Identify Critical Demographic Variables Affecting Patient Safety Culture From Viewpoints of Physicians and Nurses
Background: The issues of patient safety and healthcare quality have become increasingly important around the world since the 1990s. Many hospitals manage to reduce the number of adverse events (AEs) that can threaten patient safety in healthcare organizations. Assessing the existing patient safety culture gives hospital management a clear vision of an organization’s strengths ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005